Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Which is more disgusting-to be peed on or to be spit at?

N

ot so tough to choose..is it? Who would ever want to be peed on? Right?! But think again..Assuming that a person does not carry any infections in his urinary tract, urine is sterile!! i.e., there aren't any pathogenic organisms. Whereas a normal healthy person harbours thousands of micro-organisms in his oral cavity most of the time. So, if I was to choose between life and death, I would definitely ask to be peed on rather than being contaminated with spit!!

3 comments:

The Chhamanator said...

What would happen if someone spit urine at you??

killerX57 said...

but the question is: which is more disgusting... not, which is more sanitary... so i'd have to say that to be peed on is more disgusting. It is definately more pre-meditated. Spitting could just be a reaction, but to pull it out and pee on someone really makes a statement. (just stumbled onto your blog... thought i'd put in my 2 cents worth)

Anonymous said...

Strange question.
Mandy

Post a Comment